My Thoughts
The Performance Conversation Revolution: Why Most Managers Get It Spectacularly Wrong
Related Articles:
Performance management. Just typing those words makes me want to reach for a strong coffee and lock my office door.
After 18 years of watching managers fumble their way through performance conversations like they're defusing a bomb with oven mitts, I've reached a controversial conclusion: 87% of performance issues aren't actually performance issues at all. They're communication failures wrapped in corporate bureaucracy and served with a side of managerial cowardice.
Let me tell you about Sarah from my Brisbane office. Brilliant accountant, terrible at meeting deadlines. For six months, her manager danced around the issue like it was radioactive waste. Weekly one-on-ones became exercises in passive-aggressive hint-dropping. "So, Sarah, how are you tracking with those monthly reports?" while Sarah sat there wondering if she was about to be fired or promoted.
When I finally sat down with Sarah myself, the real issue tumbled out in about ninety seconds. She'd been struggling with a new software system but felt too embarrassed to ask for help because "everyone else seemed to get it instantly." Classic imposter syndrome meets inadequate onboarding. Fixed it with two training sessions and a buddy system.
The Authenticity Trap (And Why It's Rubbish)
Here's where I'm going to lose some of you progressive management types: authenticity in performance conversations is overrated. Actually, it's worse than overrated—it's dangerous.
"Just be authentic!" they cry from their leadership seminars. Mate, if I was truly authentic during performance reviews, I'd probably tell Jenkins from accounts that his PowerPoint presentations make me want to fake my own death and move to New Zealand. That's not helpful. That's just me being a grumpy middle-aged consultant with strong opinions about font choices.
What people actually need is intentional honesty. There's a massive difference.
Intentional honesty means I tell Sarah her deadline issues are affecting team morale, but I frame it as a solvable problem rather than a character assassination. Authenticity means I might tell her she's driving me mental and I've started having stress dreams about overdue reports.
The companies that excel at this—and I'm thinking specifically of organisations like Atlassian and Canva here in Australia—they train their managers to separate the person from the problem. Revolutionary concept, apparently.
The "Difficult Conversation" Myth
Can we please stop calling them difficult conversations? They're only difficult because we've convinced ourselves they should be. It's like calling exercise "movement punishment"—the framing creates the problem.
I prefer "clarity conversations." Much better ring to it, don't you think?
Here's my framework (developed after approximately 847 coffee-fueled debates with HR professionals who shall remain unnamed):
The CLEAR Method:
- Context: Set the scene without drama
- Listen: Actually listen, don't just wait for your turn to talk
- Explore: Dig into the real issues together
- Agree: Find mutual solutions
- Review: Check in regularly, not just when things go pear-shaped
Simple? Yes. Easy? About as easy as teaching a cat to file tax returns.
The context bit trips up most managers. They either go in guns blazing ("We need to talk about your performance") or they're so wishy-washy that the employee leaves thinking they've just had a pleasant chat about the weather.
Try this instead: "Sarah, I'd like to spend some time talking about how we can better support you with the monthly reporting process. I've noticed some challenges, and I want to understand what's happening from your perspective."
See? Not difficult. Not dramatic. Just clear.
The Feedback Sandwich Is Stale
While we're demolishing sacred management cows, let's talk about the feedback sandwich. You know the one: positive comment, criticism, positive comment. Like wrapping medicine in chocolate.
It doesn't work. It never worked. It just trains people to ignore positive feedback because they're waiting for the "but."
I learned this the hard way during my early days managing a team in Perth. Spent fifteen minutes telling James how brilliant his client relationship skills were, then mentioned his timesheets were consistently late, then finished with praise about his problem-solving abilities. James walked away thinking he was doing great overall and continued submitting timesheets whenever he felt like it.
Now I deliver feedback straight. One issue, one conversation. "James, your timesheets are late every week, and it's creating extra work for accounts. What's going on?" Done. Clear. Respectful. Actionable.
The positive stuff? That gets its own conversation. Revolutionary, I know.
When Support Doesn't Actually Support
Here's something that'll ruffle feathers: sometimes being supportive means having uncomfortable conversations early rather than comfortable ones too late.
I watched a manager in Melbourne spend eight months "supporting" an underperforming team member by gradually reducing their responsibilities, picking up their slack, and generally treating them like they were made of spun glass. Know what happened? The team member left anyway, convinced they were being pushed out, and the rest of the team was burnt out from covering the extra work.
Real support looks like this conversation: "Tom, I've noticed you're struggling with the new project management system. This is important for your role, so let's figure out how to get you confident with it. Would you prefer one-on-one training, online courses, or shadowing someone who's mastered it?"
Not: "Don't worry about the project updates, Tom. I'll handle them for now."
The first approach treats Tom like a capable professional who needs specific help. The second treats him like a problem to be managed around.
The Performance Plan That Actually Works
Most performance improvement plans are death certificates written in corporate-speak. "Employee will demonstrate improved communication skills by..." followed by a laundry list of behaviours that would make a robot weep.
Instead, try this radical approach: involve the employee in writing their own development plan.
Last year, I worked with a team leader who was struggling with time management. Instead of handing her a rigid improvement plan, we sat down together and she identified what she thought the core issues were. Turns out, she was brilliant at managing her own work but terrible at saying no to interruptions.
Her solution? Two-hour focused work blocks in the morning with her instant messenger set to "do not disturb." My solution would have been time management training and a bunch of tracking spreadsheets. Hers actually worked.
The Emotional Intelligence Elephant
Nobody talks about this, but performance conversations are emotional minefields for managers too. Especially if you've been promoted from within the team or you're naturally conflict-avoidant.
I've seen grown professionals postpone performance conversations for months because they're worried about how the employee will react. Meanwhile, the performance issues compound, team morale suffers, and what could have been a simple conversation becomes a full-blown crisis.
Here's some free therapy: your discomfort with the conversation is not more important than the employee's right to clear feedback and your team's right to function effectively.
Practice the conversation beforehand. Not the whole thing—you're not delivering a TED talk—but practice the key messages until you can say them without your voice going up three octaves.
The Follow-Up Fiasco
Most managers treat performance conversations like they're one-and-done deals. Have the conversation, tick the box, move on with life. Then they're genuinely surprised when nothing changes.
Would you plant a garden and never water it again? Performance improvement needs regular check-ins, just like plants need regular watering. Weekly at first, then monthly once things stabilise.
And here's the kicker: make these check-ins about problem-solving, not policing. "How did this week go with the new approach?" not "Have you been following the plan?"
One sounds like a conversation between professionals. The other sounds like a parole officer checking in with a repeat offender.
The Cultural Reality Check
Australian workplace culture adds its own special flavour to performance conversations. We're conflict-avoidant by nature, masters of the understated criticism, and generally prefer to sort things out over a coffee rather than in a formal meeting.
This works beautifully until it doesn't.
"Mate, you might want to have a think about how you're approaching those client calls" sounds supportive and very Australian. It's also completely unclear. Think about what? Which client calls? What specifically needs to change?
We can maintain our cultural preference for indirect communication while still being specific about the issues and expectations. It just takes practice and intentionality.
The Technology Trap
One final rant before I wrap up: performance management software is making this whole process worse, not better. I've seen managers spend more time updating systems than actually talking to their people.
The best performance conversations happen over coffee, in casual settings, when both parties can speak freely without someone taking formal notes. Yes, document the outcomes, but don't let the documentation drive the process.
Your performance management system should serve your conversations, not the other way around.
The uncomfortable truth is that most performance issues could be prevented with better hiring practices, clearer role expectations, and regular informal feedback. But since we can't turn back time, we need to get better at having these conversations when they're needed.
Start with curiosity instead of judgement. Ask questions before making statements. Focus on behaviour and impact rather than personality and character. And for the love of all that's caffeinated, follow up consistently.
Performance management isn't rocket science. It's just human communication with slightly higher stakes and more paperwork.
Now if you'll excuse me, I have three "clarity conversations" scheduled for this afternoon, and I need to practice not rolling my eyes when someone mentions "synergistic performance optimisation."
Our Favourite Blogs: